Q: its flexibility, not the level

In 2016, there were two Q flyoffs in Rinkaby. In one a model did over 10 minutes. So they wised up and decided the second flyoff by DTing the models to the ground at the end of their motor runs. A perfect example of “the nail hitting the hammer on the head”.

So Q’s energy multiplier of 4Joule/gram (translated into individual motor run lengths) is too high! Performance has to be cut across the board! Europeans are clamoring for a 3J/gr for the next rule change. But Americans don’t have a flyoff problem. We had a 3 person flyoffs at the Maxmen decided in a single flyoff and Dick Ivers was the only clean Q flier at the Nats in a field of 14.

Now to a well-kept secret: Q’s motor run is completely flexible.  One can reduce the energy budget or the motor run as easily as adjusting the DT time. So, in the Rinkaby case, all they had to do is cut the energy multiplier by say 25% - corresponding to a shortening of the motor run by the same percentage; problem solved.

More generally, we should retain the current 4J/gr energy multiplier, but allow the CD or jury to reduce it by 12.5% steps as needed during regular rounds or flyoffs. Max motor runs will be similarly reduced by 5 seconds each step. So, reducing the multiplier to 3.5J/gr corresponds to a 35 sec motor run. (3J/gr to 30 Sec etc.)

In fact I have submitted exactly such a proposal, currently being evaluated by the FF Team selection committee. In regular rounds the energy multiplier can be dropped to 3J/gr (25% reduction) and 2.5J/gr in flyoffs (37.5% reduction). This proposal is currently being opposed to at the FFTSC on the grounds that rule changes hinder the event. But if the flexible energy multiplier alternative is not on the table at CIAM’s next meeting in April, it’s almost certain that we, the Q fliers, will be flying to the tune of 3J/gr across the board.

Aram